Bush recently floated immigration 'reform' to give amnesty to illegals and make it tougher for legal entry. People respond to incentives, and the rate of illegal crossings has increased to get in under the wire. But why worry? Twenty years ago we put in place this exact policy, and it has failed miserably. It looks like we will do it again, so why not in another 20 years? Crises come and go, but political pandering seems to go on forever.
This policy has the incentives exactly backwards. It is hard to get legal immigrants in, so Silicon Valley companies going begging to fill their H1B visas for skilled workers; and yet unskilled illegals continue to flood in. A better policy would be to make it easy for legal immigration - guestworkers if you like - and hard for illegals. No amnesty. Require them to return, apply and come back as guestworkers. If unskilled, they can be hired below the minimum wage, as happens now with illegals. In the interim the jobs won't go begging as the new guestworkers can come in and fill them. And our skill industries to go back to attracting the best and brightest from around the planet without having to worry over H1B visa limits. Much better than what we have now - insourcing the unskilled and outsourcing the skilled.
Recent Comments