The Root Causes of the Current Financial Crisis

Last October I summarized a trenchant analysis by Anna Schwartz, co-author with Milton Friedman of the seminal A Monetary History of the United States.  She pointed out that Bernanke was solving the wrong problem - in a misguided attempt to replay history and prevent the last Great Depression, he was treating the banking crisis as a liquidity problem when instead it was a solvency problem.   Today in the WSJ the Stanford economist John B. Taylor explains how we got into this mess in How Government Created the Financial Crisis.  For those who do not get the online version of the Journal, let me summarize:

1. Greenspan caused the bubble by holding interest rates too low for too long in 2003-5.
2. Fannie/Freddie exacerbated the problem with subsidized mortgages and relaxed requirements, and the encouragement of excessive risk-taking by backing the securitization of subprime loans.
3. The initial response to the crisis in Aug 9-10, 2007 when money market interest rates rose dramatically was to treat the problem as one of liquidity, so the Fed initiated the Term Auction Facility on Dec07.  The TAF made little difference to the widened spreads. This should have clued them in that the rise in those rates was due to lack of confidence in the solvency of the counter-party (the other side) to money market funds, not liquidity.  
4. The next response was the $100B tax rebate passed in Feb08 to jumpstart consumption. It had little impact since as Milton Friedman had pointed out, only permanent changes in income cause consumers to change their spending behavior, not temporary rebates.  
5. The third response was a large drop in short term rates from 5.25% in Aug07 to 2% in Apr08.  This was sharper than warranted by the Taylor Rule (named after the author).  It caused a sharp drop in the USD and a sharp rise in Oil, exacerbating the crisis.
6. The collapse of Lehman Bros. did not cause the most dramatic leg of the crisis.  Interest rate spreads changed very slightly between the Friday before the bankruptcy (Sep12) and the Monday after (Sep15).
7. The panic was caused by the $700B TARP, the bill that Anna Schwartz had criticized solving the wrong problem.  Panic set in after this bill was debated and the public realized how poorly thought through it was, and how much more serious the problem appeared to be.

Taylor concludes that we should base policy on clearly understood problems and clearly thought-through solutions.  The crisis was misunderstood from the beginning and the plans to fix it have accordingly been poorly designed and largely ineffective.  As to the current Stimulus Bill, which he does not mention, Taylor concludes:

Massive responses with little explanation will probably make things worse  This is the lesson from the crisis so far.

Comments

[Steven_737]

"Massive responses with little explanation will probably make things worse"

who will explain what to whom?

I guess that he means
"Massive responses with little understanding of the situation will probably make things worse "

Duncan do you agree with "understanding of the situation" or your take on this is different?

It is too bad that people cannot write clearly, because they are not able to convey their thoughts.

[Steven_737]

Duncan,

I think Taylor is very keen to by-pass the psychological effects of the Lehman collapse on the stock market;

Taylor in his article states that ”The realization by the public that the government's intervention plan had not been fully thought through, and the official story that the economy was tanking, likely led to the panic seen in the next few weeks..”

His thesis is based on “LIKELY” ?!

Why not accept the obvious, i.e. that ”The fear by the public that banks like Lehman will fail, and the official story that the economy was tanking, led to the panic seen in the next few weeks.. The de-leveraging of hedge funds accelerated the fall into the abyss”.

By the way, the article is detailed on analysis of past events (15/20 hindsight… not 20/20) and lacking proposals on what needs to be done.

Steven_737

[E. Grigsby Snarf]

Duncan,

You've obviously not been paying attention to any of President Obama's speeches. He has made it clear to even the most obstenent among us that the current crisis was created by the tax cuts of the last eight years.

[yelnick]

Snarf, clearly not! When The One says the only thing we have to fear is not being afraid enough, I guess I tune out. I saw that the 'help the rich' rate cut part of Bush's cuts (39% to 36%) are worth about $30B a year, so in one Porkulus Obama is creating a deficit that it would have taken Bush 30 years to create! I can only conclude that Bush did not cut enough, hence Obama's remarks.

[Vani]

This little vetgitne is so rich, if one is willing to look a bit deeper. I may be reading too much into this, but here’s where I went with it: Those moments of honesty (“Terrible, nobody wants me any more”) are a heart truth, a feeling of uselessness that calls for attention, even in the face of the apparent contradiction by the Elder’s change in demeanor when family shows up. This, to me, is perhaps very telling. It can take more than periodic visits from beloved people to have a person feel deeply connected. That’s where Greenhouse communities come in (and people like Sarah) by creating a steady, enveloping community of constancy of connection. They are truly environments that culture well-being. “Culture,” here, is a verb, as in growing a culture in a petri dish. Remember those from high school biology class? With the right “environment” they would become overgrown with lush life. So Greenhouse communities “culture” the rich, almost undefinable experience of human connection, of being valued and useful, of being wanted for who you are, of being truly Alive.