Planet Yelnick

Wait For Divergences in the AUD Near the End

A few soft days and the bears clamor for P3 down or the end of a large Ending Diagonal. Instead I am watching the AUD. An interesting correlation since the Global Financial Crisis has been AUD and the S&P.

The rationale for the correlation is the Global Scramble for Yield that I first mentioned almost a decade ago - in a low return enviroment money mangers scramble anywhere they can for smidgeons of yield. The Greenspan Put exacerbated this, and so too the Bernank's QE.

The more specific correlation is that QE drives up commodities, something also predicted here, and therefore commodity currencies like the AUD. Australia, however, is now in a bind, as its currency is over-valued for its value-added industries, and its mining exports are suffering due to the Chinese slowdown that may yet turn into a hard landing. Indeed, the AUD correlation broke over the past nine months as China began to slow:

Some traders also watch the AUDJPY corelation, which also broke down. 

The bind puts pressure on the RBA to lower rates, to weaken the AUD and support the slowing failing housing sector.  

We can tell which it is (liquidity pump/optimism or rush to safety/fear) by looking at the TNX (ten year Treasury). In the final rush to safety, its rate should fall below their recent low of 1.4%, maybe down to 1.2%. Right now the TNX has gone the other way, and many pundits - including EWI in a recent bond report - says the great bond bull market is over. We'll see.  

The neoclassical economics have pushed the liquidity pump, and want it to be followed up with fiscal stimulus. Problem is, that ain't happening as tea party types around the globe have instead pushed for various forms of fiscal responsibility and austerity. This has caused many of the leading economists to get a bit hysterical, since they know that the liquidity pump sans a fiscal pump leads to a deeper drop than we saw in 2001 or 2008. Hence you see in a lot of predictions a growing sense of a disaster, a cliff the world is about to fall off of.

In the short run, such as US equities this past week, we saw a fade off the recent QE rally. Indeed, most of the QE Rally across various markes is gone, except in commodities. Does this mean we have topped? Unlikely. Neely sees us in a pattern which should soon turn north again, have a fade, then another runup. This might unfold all the way into the election, expecially if it remains close.  

Rather than call the top, watch the divergence. 

3DTV Without Glasses

In 2010, CES was all about 3DTV. I thought 3D would flop, or more prosaically, rapidly commoditize as just another feature in a flat screen TV. That certainly was what has happened.

The breakthrough would be to remove the 3D glasses, which is technically feasible as TV processing speeds up, but is just a lab project right now. On small screens I have seen a polarized approach to glasses-free 3D, especially to spice up videogames. Now the polarized approach is being tested on larger screens. A cheaper approach, but also years away, and in the demonstrations I have seen, an approach wtih a very narrow range of viewing (a small sweet spot for the 3D effect). The other method, using faster processing, would create multiple decent viewing angles.

In either case, not likely to hit CES until late this decade. Instead, the Next Big Thing is 4K TV - HDTV at much higher resolution. We should see multiple demo units at CES 2013. 

The Settop Box Is Beginning to Disappear

HBO just launched an OTT service to the Nordic countries - huge move, not tied to cable, presaging what is about to come. Something like 30% of viewing is now off TV, and tends to be excerpts not the whole title. The Smart TVs finally have a sufficient built-in capabiltyy to enable direct to TV over IP without STB. Something like 200M will ship in the next 18 months, growing to 50% of all flat TV shipments by 2016. Google plans to sell off the settop box business from Motorola, preferring more open platforms and knowing that the cable providers prefer to lock-in their customers. All of these means the disruption is about to become painful to the incumbents.    

Election Year Pattern With a Twist

I have been following the election year pattern and it remains on track, with a 2 - 3 day lag (see chart, courtesy PragCap).  There is an interesting twist this election, but first a discussion of the general situation. The prognosis, per PragCap:

Looking ahead, this version of the Presidential Cycle Pattern says that we should expect to see a choppy uptrend continuing toward election day, perhaps with some significant “texture” along the way.  The strong correlation up until now suggests that this pattern is working reliably.  Once we see how the election turns out, we can then figure out which pattern to follow starting in November.

What is interesting is that this version of the chart has taken out the 2d terms and only focused on first term Presidents, a more true comparison to this election. The generic chart that we showed in the prior post combines first and second terms and the behavior is different in each term. Per PragCap: 

As a rule, [new Presidents] all typically spend the first year in office “discovering” that conditions are even worse than we were told during the campaign, and that the “only solution” is some urgent package of tax changes, spending, regulations, etc. ...

When a first term president wins reelection to a second term, then he typically does not spend much time in the first year telling us all about what a lousy job his predecessor did.  That lack of a persistent negative message seems to work out to bring slightly better market performance right after a reelection.

But with a new president from a different party, investors tend to get discouraged hearing that things are worse than expected, and so the market’s performance during the first few months with a new party president is on average slightly worse than if an incumbent wins reelection.  Over time, though, it tends to average out to be just about the same.

This chart shows the comparison of first term vs second term Presidents:

What is different this time is the pattern has not worked well in the last three elections, perhaps because we hit a secular bull market peak in 1999 and have been in a secular bear through the past three elections. The pattern broke in 2000 and 2008 when we had market crashes; it also didn't hold in 2004. 

This time there is a lot of can-kicking going on to push the problems to after the US election.  A lot of commentary over the past week out of Eruope thinks the latest ECB moves can buy 3 months, and of course the fiscal cliff doesnt rear until after the lection. The one stinker is that we may hit the debt ceiling limit faster than expected, before the election. 

Samsung's Ambitious Android Camera

Following Nikon's android camera, and not losing a beat after its big patent loss to Apple, Samsung launches a Galaxy camera. Lots of coverage, ranging from "yet another" android smartphamera (gets the award for awkward cleverness) to "crazy attempt" to fuse smartphone and point-and-shoot. 

Samsung has added some interesting twists on just having Instagram and other photo apps in your digicam. Like Nikon, they have easy sharing with Facebook et al. Beyond Nikon, and as a part of their fight with Apple, they offer their sCloud version of Apple's iCloud, which automatically uploads all your photos to Samsung's cloud. Other cloud services, like Dropbox and SugarSync also do this, and free you from the clutches of the phone vendor; still, this is a very good idea. 

As a camera, it has a huge 4.8" view screen, 16 megapixe sensor, and a 21x optiocal zoom. Pricing unkown.